Site icon fadanista

Mountain View from Itch-to-Stitch

I am not really a fickle person but I am throwing over my Jalie Éléonore pull on jeans in favour of the Itch-to-Stitch Mountain View pull on jeans – for the moment!

You might ask why, and it’s a good question as they have a lot of similarities. The description of the Mountain View pull on jeans includes the following:

I was seduced by the higher mid-rise and the straight cut legs, and I always love the layers feature. I also decided that the back seam would allow me to refine the fit at the back, and I look forward to playing with this feature now that I’ve made the jeans and can see what I can do.

This is my first pair, with no tweaks, apart from sizing down two sizes between my waist and hips. The fit is ok, but I know that I can get them better than this. I first posted these jeans when I blogged my Itch-to-Stitch Nottingham top and they are a bit of a heavenly match.

In the instructions the pockets are almost the last things to be added to the jeans, which I found rather odd. I therefore added mine after I put the two back pieces together, when they were flat. This made more sense to me, but, yes, you guessed it, the pockets looked like they were sliding down my legs, so needed to be raised by 4cm. The delay in adding the pockets means that the placement can be sensibly determined, but also means that the back seam can be tweaked once the jeans are together, so I missed that opportunity too.

It’s hard to see, but I get weird bubbles of fabric on my inner thighs in most trousers and these jeans are no exception. The photo below just shows it on the right inner thigh.

I also get a bit of bagginess on the outside lower hip. This could be eliminated by grading down even more, and I may do that next time.

Now that we are, ahem, examining my derriere, did you notice the bird on my pocket? I do not usually embellish my pockets, but when I saw what Crystal from Sewing Vortex did with the pockets on her Danube skirt, I decided I had to do something similar – thanks Crystal!

I drew out this very simple bird (inspiration came from a tattoo website) on to some tear away and, using the BSR foot on my machine, satin stitched round it with variegated thread.

The BSR  stands for Bernina Stitch Regulator and it is a foot that makes the stitch an even length irrespective of speed but I found it really difficult to control because the feed dogs have to be dropped. However, I am rather pleased with my bird. It looks a little rough round the edges as I’ve only torn away the tearaway. I am expecting it to smooth out when I wash the jeans and the rest dissolves, and my chalk marks wash off.

My pocket topstitching looks a little tatty because of course, I had to unpick them and reattach.

A note on the topstitching. When I was in Montréal, my friend Hélène gave me a packet of double eyed sewing machine needles. Neither of us had ever seen these before. I decided that I wanted to use them on these jeans, so threaded them up and away I went. It was only when I began writing this post that I googled them and learned some interesting facts:

“Schmetz Double Eye Sewing Machine Needles for Decorative Sewing & Basting

You may recall these needles from many years ago. They were called “Magic Needles” or “Basting Needles”. They have two eyes, one above the other on one shank. Originally used for machine basting, they had disappeared for quite some time, and have now been re-discovered for decorative stitching! Size 80 only.

To use for machine basting:

For decorative stitching:

How interesting is the basting tip? I’m definitely going to try that. I thought I would try the topstitching method for my next pair of jeans but used my old Bernina 830 for the topstitching and it did not like the needle at all. I reverted to cordonette in the end.

The second pair of jeans is from a stretchier denim and this does make a difference. I tried tweaking the back, but I still don’t have a good fit so I might need to convert this pattern to my jeans block which will alter the crotch curve. I did concentrate on embroidering those back pockets though and here is a little montage of the process. Both pockets are shown here.

This time I just stuck that picture under the needle and used a regular foot. The only thing I did was adjust the stitch width as I went round to get the thick and thin elements. I didn’t do such a good job with the ears and I think squinting is necessary to work out that these are cats, but I am still pretty happy with them.

This photo shows that I haven’t got the fit of the back of the legs correct yet, but I will work on it. I am going to take in that side seam at the hip a bit more to try and eliminate a couple of the wrinkles there and I might take a wedge out of the inner thigh. It’s always tricky with jeans to make adjustments after the fact because of the topstitching, but I think I can work round it a bit.

 

The front is pretty good, although you can see excess fabric here and there.

So a word or two on the pattern. As with all ITS patterns, it is beautifully drafted and has some nice design features. I was quite interested in comparing these with the Jalie Éléonore pull on jeans, and I think there are enough differences to make it worth while making these. The back seam and wider legs means that more fabric is required to make them, and I thought I would love the wide waist band, but, although it is really comfortable (especially at the back), I find that I am working hard to keep it covered – a longer top would resolve this of course! The photo above shows what I mean. I really like the front pockets and they are big enough to be actually useful. I was concerned that the back seam might increase the potential for twisting in the legs, and I was very careful with this.

In summary, I know I will wear these jeans a lot, but may feel minor irritation about the fit. I am pleased that I have (almost) perfected a method for embellishing the pockets, and I look forward to going mad with this technique!

 

Exit mobile version